India
Despite Cow Shelters, Why Are Cattle Still on Streets? HC Questions State
May 15, 2026 Source: Indivox News
The Chhattisgarh High Court has raised serious concerns about the growing number of stray cattle on roads despite the existence of cow shelters across the state. During a hearing related to alleged irregularities at the Lakhasar cowshed in Bilaspur district, the state government presented its response before the court and claimed that proper facilities are being provided to cattle in registered shelters.
According to the government, there are currently 142 registered cow shelters operating across Chhattisgarh, housing nearly 39,000 cattle. Officials informed the court that these shelters provide sufficient fodder, water, and shelter for the animals. The government also denied allegations that 205 cattle were being kept in overcrowded conditions inside a small room at the shelter.
However, the division bench of Chief Justice Ramesh Sinha and Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal questioned why stray cattle continue to roam freely on roads if the existing arrangements are effective. The court observed that repeated reports of cattle wandering in public areas indicate that the current system is still inadequate.
In response, the state government assured the court that steps are being taken to improve monitoring and coordination. Officials stated that special nodal officers were appointed through an order issued on November 7, 2025. These officers are responsible for coordinating between district administrations and the Animal Husbandry Department under the Chhattisgarh Krishak Pashu Parikshan Act, 2004.
The government further said that district administrations have been instructed to ensure that cattle shelters provide proper food, water, shelter, and other basic facilities. To strengthen accountability, the Director of the Animal Husbandry Department has also been directed to submit monthly progress reports regarding the management of stray and confiscated cattle.
Despite the government’s assurances, the High Court decided not to close the matter and scheduled the next hearing for July, signaling that the court will continue monitoring the issue closely.